A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall in a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated nationwide awareness subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household residence at Sutton Strand, where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions article about René Collier as well as the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting alternatively that it is about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their lengthy-standing relationship to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple just attempting to develop a family members property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out based upon Experienced guidance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for your condition that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on scheduling and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as developed complies with planning authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful charges have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental security and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.